Talk:The Grand Knockout Tournament

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

British Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amusement Parks: Merlin Entertainments Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Merlin Entertainments task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Press Conference

I thought it was Prince Edward (not Prince Andrew) who stormed out the press conference after he asked the press whether they were enjoying themselves and nobody replied.--Jamesedmo 09:37, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity team members

A bit of trivia to insert if this article gets expanded: I seem to remember that Christopher Reeve was one of the celebrity team members, though I don't remember whose team he was on. It was quite a while ago when I watched it. --Death phoenix 3 July 2005 06:11 (UTC)

Rowan Atkinson may have been a team member, but he was also the compere, dishing out the sarcastic ripostes in his "BlackAdder 2" costume 90.207.49.117 (talk) 16:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Wasn't this officially titled The Grand Knockout Tournament? -Bonalaw 14:42, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to Events

I still have this on videotape! Wonderful event. I'm stunned to find out that it was an "embarassment". Correction to the event descriptions: they did not dress up as giant vegetables and throw hams at each other; those were two separate events. The giant vegetable event had six people dress up as giant vegetables (2 of each kind of potato, leek, and onion) and run off, chased down by one person each from 2 opposing teams. The vegetables had to be chased down and the costumes removed (sometimes with force!) and then the costume thrown into a giant black cauldron. The "ham throwing" event was where a royal table sat in front of a pool with foam-covered spinnable logs which had to be crossed lengthwise. The feasting "royalty" (the other team) would throw sponge hams and rolls to try to unbalance the racing contestants. 220.23.58.94 14:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Freemount[reply]

There are two camps regarding this programme. Those who call it "It's a Royal Knockout" and judge the whole thing on the involvement of the Royal Family, and those who call it by it's proper title, "The Grand Knockout Tournament" who look past the Royals and see it as a Celebrity (real celebrities, no Big Brother housemates or Love rats here!) version of a popular TV Show. (AndrewAnorak 06:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Official Title

The title should be changed to "The Grand Knockout Tournament". That can clearly be seen on the banners on the trumpeters in my copy of the USA Networks broadcast. My brother recently sent me our 20 year old copy of the videotape, which I am converting to a DVD for our family. Does anyone know if a BBC recording of this even exists? I've been able to find very little information. (DaveDuJour 07:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Knockposter.gif

Image:Knockposter.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]