Talk:Subcompact car

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Subcompact car. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Subcompact car at the Reference desk.

Why is this page called subcompact car? I believed it was close to universal to call it golf-class cars? 2006-11-16 81.233.73.177/Håkan

US-centric. Like it says at compact car, the size class descriptions are by no means universal, and in fact relate principally to the market in the USA.

Charles Matthews 07:26, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Merge

Talk:Supermini#Merge_to_Subcompact Shadiac (talk) 07:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - BUT, with the merge going the other way. A quick bit of research shows that the term supermini is far more widely spread than subcompact, which doesn't seem to permeate outside of the USA. Grunners (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Subcompact is an American classification which should not be combined with the current European classification, although a European Supermini section has been added to the Subcompact article showing European vehicles. No need to combine as See other section can take a reader to either article.(Vegavairbob (talk) 02:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Oppose - The term "subcompact" is clearly defined in the United States (see the EPA's vehicle size classifications here). On the other hand, the descriptor "supermini" is inherently an oxymoron - similar to "jumbo shrimp" - since most supermini cars are often neither "super" cars nor truly "mini" in size! Moreover, the origin of this term seems to be a "Boastful Superlative" that was cooked up for an automotive publication as a comparison to the original Mini, and not a defined term such as "B-segment small cars". For example, the MSN editorial What the Heck Is the B-Segment? does not contain the term "supermini" to describe the reviewed "subcompact" cars. Thanks! CZmarlin (talk) 21:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - for the same reasons as stated above. Boo-yah!!--71.162.161.175 (talk) 15:50, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

support- the new article should be titled b segment cars seeing as that is in wide use inside major auto manufactureres. it is also not an oxymorone and is officialy used by euro ncap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.85.180.44 (talk) 22:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - If americans get an article for subcompact, europeans should get an article on supermini. No double standards. Bookster451 (talk) 02:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]