Talk:Hock (anatomy)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
VfD
[edit]On April 26, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Hock (zoology) for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 12:52, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
hox
[edit]Some dinosaurs, like velociraptor, had a hock in both of its legs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.238.133.210 (talk) 18:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- No, they didn't. Look at the actual skeletons, not crappy artistic reconstructions. Mokele (talk) 18:13, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class mammal articles
- Low-importance mammal articles
- WikiProject Mammals articles
- Start-Class equine articles
- Low-importance equine articles
- WikiProject Equine articles
- Stub-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class Animal anatomy articles
- Low-importance Animal anatomy articles
- WikiProject Animal anatomy articles
- Transwikied to Wiktionary