User talk:Auximines
Welcome
[edit]Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 15:07, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading the Kraftwerk album covers. Secretlondon 13:43, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I suggest Wikipedia:Wikiproject Albums/Needs infobox Secretlondon 20:32, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
The Moody Blues
[edit]Are you sure your recent edit of The Moody Blues ([1]) is entirely fair? Given that this was a band that enjoyed most of its popularity in the UK and the US, US-centered phrasing is not entirely inappropriate (at the very least, the American POV should be given some heed). I agree, however, that the reference to the so-called British Invasion belongs in the body of the article, not in its first paragraph. -- Itai 17:45, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I've replied on the Moody Blues talk page [[2]]. --Auximines 09:08, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Snooker loopy
[edit]I replied about Jimmy White on my talk page. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 19:27, 23 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Re: Ken Doherty (engineer)
[edit]He went through a phase a few months back of receiving a lot of coverage, however I think it has all died down and he has probably receded to being "non-famous"
Infoboxes for snooker players
[edit]Thanks for the effort that you put into creating the infoboxes for all of those snooker players. However, they could probably look alot better if you added a little colour to them (eg: some shade of green). A very good page which lists loads of examples of infoboxes can be found at Infoboxes. User_talk:ChicXulub 16:38, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]I replied on my talk page. Abigail 13:48, May 21, 2004 (UTC)
Snooker articles
[edit]Nice work on all the Snooker articles. Burgundavia 08:48, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- I frequently watch New Pages so I see lots of dross going by. It is nice to see a page that I have to do nothing to. Burgundavia 08:55, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Still at it I see. When is this epic project of yours going to be done? Burgundavia 09:24, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Sorry for not getting back to you before about the categorisation stuff. I was just using the Nigel Bond page as a test to see if I could get the snooker players category to format properly. If you are interested there as an in-depth article on this subject at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization ChicXulub 22:48, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I'm sure we've made a mistake with the nationalities of many of the snooker players. All of the people who come from England, Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland should have a British nationality (which should link to the United Kingdom). ChicXulub 14:52, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
John Williams
[edit]With limited apology, I deleted the Snooker referee from the disambiguation page for John Williams, - I'm trying to create at least a biographic stub for each name listed. If you've got enough info, then create the page [[John Williams (snooker)]] then we can add him back. Thanks... Lou I 22:50, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Airports infobox
[edit]Thanks for the comments on my infobox. Burgundavia 03:37, Jun 17, 2004 (UTC)
Photos
[edit]Could you say which license you are uploading photos under - whether they are GFDL, Public Domian etc. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for a list. Thanks. Secretlondon 08:38, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
England expects
[edit]My source was the Historical Maritime Society. Of course, they may be wrong as well - I'll have a look next time I'm in Trafalgar Square. --ALargeElk | Talk 09:17, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Excellent work with the flags. One question - is Popham 8 just plain white? If so, perhaps it might be better to put a hairline border round it - on a white background, it doesn't show up.--ALargeElk | Talk 11:22, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
List of number one hits (UK)
[edit]The info is freely available in lots of places. Here's a few:
- http://www.onlineweb.com/theones/
- http://www.everyhit.com/number.html
- http://freespace.virgin.net/sharon.persky/music.html
I use everyhit as my main source. Bonalaw 10:30, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Go ahead. I'll return to the list in due course, but there's only so much of it I can cope with typing at a time, so I'd be quite glad if someone else would do a bit! Bonalaw 10:50, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Wow! Thanks a lot for your work on that. I've looked over the pages and made a few changes (mainly splitting collaborations so each collaborator has a link to their own page). I'm leaving it to you to cut & paste as I don't want to steal your credit. Bonalaw 18:05, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Welwyn Garden City grammar
[edit]Good to see someone is on the ball regarding grammar.
The user 4.23.83.100 is trolling, and he has been at it for over three days without any change in his behavior. I was wondering if we can block his IP. He is doing it from a static IP, Evergreen Medical Group Inc. EMG-83-16 (NET-4-23-83-0-1) 4.23.83.0 - 4.23.83.255 and a company can probably do without the wikipedia. Any ideas on how to do it?
Mark Williams disambiguation
[edit]There are quite a lot of people in the world called Mark Williams. Any objections to me creating a disambiguation page and redirecting all the snooker links to a page like [[Mark Williams (snooker player)]]? --The Brain of Morbius 07:29, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I take issue with you restoring faulty information concerning the circumstances when a free ball is allowed. In particular, I'm referring to this edit. -- Dissident (Talk) 01:41, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Article Licensing
[edit]Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
Thanks for uploading the image
I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the image and I'll tag it for you. Thanks, Kbh3rd 04:03, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Cat Stevens external links - silly?
[edit]Can I ask why you think my external links (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cat_Stevens&diff=0&oldid=9565618) were, in your opinion, silly? I looked up this article specifically to find out about Cats in the Cradle and, not finding the answer on Wikipedia, had to find out via Google. This misattribution is common, and a link (Did Cat Stevens sing/write "Cat's in the Cradle?") to further info would, in at least my opinion, be useful. I now realise that the second link to further info about Cats in the Cradle (Behind the Song: Cat's in the Cradle) was not relevant, and ought to have been reverted, but this irrelevence (silly?) criteria does not apply to the first link IMO. -- Slark
Cat Stevens wrote and sang dozens of songs. Why have a link regarding a song he didn't write? Anyway, catstevens.com is already linked. --Auximines 19:53, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
More Cat Stevens
[edit]I noticed you've edited and dealt with some issues regarding the Cat Stevens article in the past, and thought that the peer review I started might interest you. I'm going to try to get the article to featured status, and hopefully you can offer up some comments or suggestions here. Thanks in advance, Mrtea (talk) 17:53, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Twelve Level Cap and Rank System
[edit]At best, I think both are acceptable (although I suspect that rei is only becoming popular because most people nowadays only think of rei when they see that kanji.) For example, see this [[3]]. If you are studying Japanese in addition to Japanese history, you will quickly learn that there are often several accepted pronunciations for a lot of older terms and names. For example, I routinely see both Umayado and Umayato for Shotoku Taishi's given name. Anyway, if you want to add rei, that's probably okay, but please do not delete rai.-Jefu 07:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Strachan Open
[edit]Was just browsing here, and it contains the phrase "Most of the top sixteen players did bother to enter." Is this a typo that should be "did not bother", or do you mean "most of the top sixteen players entered nonetheless" ? Could you maybe clarify it please? Smb1001 18:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Remove link to insecure page?
[edit]Auximines, why did you remove my post ("Happy holiday everyone!")? You said, in the edit summary, that it was because I linked to an insecure page. But how is http://www.huumor.com/joke_3517 "insecure"? (It's OK--my post was not a question anyways. I'm just curious about how that joke page is "insecure".) --Bowlhover 00:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- It popped up several windows on my PC and attempted to download some malware. Fortunately my anti-virus software stopped it. I'd avoid that site if I were you. --Auximines 09:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
[edit]
- Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays Auximines! | AndonicO Talk | Sign Here 01:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. :-) | AndonicO Talk | Sign Here 10:14, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: Hidenokuni and other sumo bits
[edit]I might activate that list at some time in the next week or so, but I haven't worked on it in a while (and I've missed the coverage of the last few basho). There's a bit on Nathan Strange here [4]. There's very little else on him, unfortunately ... and his short participation in the sumo world probably explains that well. -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 02:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Sumo-bio-stub
[edit]Hi - it has come to our notice that you have recently created a new stub type. As it clearly states at WP:STUB, at the top of most stub categories, on the template page for new Wikiprojects and in many other places on Wikipedia, new stub types should be proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies, and whether better use could be made of a WikiProject-specific talk page template.
In the case of your new stub type, it is well named and sensible, but there is no indication that it will reach the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there about it. And please, in future, propose new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 23:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:ELO A New World Record album cover.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:ELO A New World Record album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 12:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Sumo WikiProject
[edit]Please be informed that I have a WikiProject Sumo Proposal outstanding. Please join me and others in trying to make wikipedia a better place for sumo! thanks XinJeisan 20:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Terao
[edit]Thanks for fixing Terao's Izutsu entry. I knew he never made ozeki, but I was so amazed that he wasn't even on the list that I got ahead of myself. He is still my favorite yokozuna who never was (and a lot of people's of course). Malnova 23:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Hitodama
[edit]Yes, I can see how silly the long lists are, however, I do not fancy the idea of deleting it without any discussion. I understand that most of the items in the list are just not hitodama at all but just look alikes, and that could be shortened. MythSearchertalk 16:07, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Discussion at manual of style/Japan
[edit]Hi Auximines. Prompted by your recent deletions of the trivial "In popular culture" sections in some articles, I started a discussion at the project:Japan talk page, and the discussion has since moved to the manual of style page, where, if all goes well, it is likely to develop into at least a basic guideline regarding these sections. I started the discussion this morning (well, European time, I'd say about 12 hours ago), had to leave the computer for the day and was too late in realising I forgot to notify you of this. Hope you don't mind the delay. Since you were the kikkake for my even starting the discussion (which is coming along great, seems there's plenty of people out there irked by these lists), it would be great if you contributed your views. Hope you don't mind me pointing you out in the opening of the discussion as I did :) TomorrowTime 18:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Nathan Strange
[edit]Thank you for starting that article on Nathan Strange-- very interesting. I remember seeing him interviewed on TV a while back in which he said the reason he left sumo was he "didn't like getting beaten up every morning". It was on one of the many "I Love The 80s" shows and it was taking a nostalgic look at Channel 4's sumo coverage. Don't suppose it counts as a reliable source though. I do, however, have a bit of info on him from a book called "Giants of Sumo" by Angela Patmore, which I'll add to the article. Pawnkingthree 09:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- I know you're not around much these days, but if you ever pop back I thought you might be interested to know that Nathan Strange himself appears to have edited the article!--Pawnkingthree (talk) 22:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:ELO Face The Music album cover.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:ELO Face The Music album cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]Hello Auximines! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Alan McManus - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- David Gray (snooker player) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- David Taylor (snooker player) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Gary Owen (snooker player) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Dean Reynolds - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Gary Wilkinson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Martin Clark (snooker) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Peters and Lee - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Requesting your opinion
[edit]Hi. I've started a discussion here. (Actually, it's a restart of a prior discussion that went cold; you can just scroll directly down to my most recent post in that section if you want.) Can you offer your thoughts? I think it's very important. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:54, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Helvellyn.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Helvellyn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Kanji en.gif listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kanji en.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 10:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Auximines. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Auximines. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Auximines. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Banzuke
[edit]Hi, hope you don't mind but I used your banzuke in a draft I'm working on. We don't have any articles on individual tournaments yet but I'm hoping to get this one finished eventually.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:36, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Auximines. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Auximines. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Timothy Marschall Jones for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Marschall Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.