User talk:Richard G.
- Richard G., thanks for your interest in the subject of Prem Rawat and your dedication to rigor. I would suggest you to start reading the archived talk sections, which will not be an elevating experience and compare the old versions of the article. Andries 20:19, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
~
- Richard G. I am working on an alternative version Prem Rawat/temp2. Andries 18:26, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Richard G. I really can not understand why you think that allegation by a personal assistant of Maharaji is irrelevant to the article. Could you please explain that? I may miss something. I know it is dirty and tasteless but this is important in assessing the guru's authenticity. David C. Lane is not the only one who says so. Anthony Storr, the British psychiatrist who wrote the book Feet of clay: a study of gurus wrote the same, if I remember it well. (not sure) Andries 19:47, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
If you think that Michael Dettmers' account is gossip then do you think that I disseminate gossip too about my former guru? I do not see much difference. Andries 20:25, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
What you did with your former guru is not justification. It's mudslinging then and it's mudslinging now. It does not go to accessing the credibility of the message or the experience that these people seem to have. Moreover, it is very apparent that you are not doing your own writing on your edits, and this is disingenuous. I also know that you and/or the other anti-people have already started to make me a character in your forum8 chat room, and given the nasty character of that place I can no longer trust you to be honest. Please do not contact me anymore.
- Richard G., until now I have generally written my own edits, but occasionally I have copied them from older versions of the articles written by other people. So you accusation is false. I occasionally discuss my edits on forum8 but they are still my edits. I do not see anything wrong in this. I do not know all the details about this subject, you see.
- what does the word "excreble" mean on the talk:Criticism of Prem Rawat? Thanks in advance. It is not in my dictionary.
- I have not mentioned your name once on Forum8. You can check this by using the search facility and please do not make me responsible for what other people write in the same forum. That would be unfair.
- I strongly disagree that I engage in mudslinging. Those people whom I desribe in my story were my friends whom I trusted and still trust. If you would like to read scholarly article on my former guru then you read here. Andries 13:30, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Contacting other people on their user pages is part of the Wikipedia project. That is normal practice that is recommended in the guidelines. Wikipedia can not function without normal civilized contact between contributors.
- Andries 13:30, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)