User talk:Geeklizzard
Welcome
[edit]Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
- You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
Again, welcome! Chris Roy 18:08, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Welcome, Geeklizzard!
Hello, Geeklizzard, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Clamster5, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Fun stuff...
{{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! question regarding your weblog
[edit]Hi, Liz. I wanted to drop you a line in regards to something on your weblog, but found that there wasn't an email address there, nor here. Do you suppose you could email me? ... aa:talk 01:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:BlogHer2006.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:BlogHer2006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
SF meetup 3
[edit]If you're interested in the next meetup, we have a new page for it: Wikipedia:Meetup/San Francisco 3 Georgewilliamherbert 20:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]I like your userpage. Hope to see more of your edits around! --Grrrlriot (talk) 00:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Your censorship of Abelard talk page material
[edit]Look, how can I put this without ending up with a mass of howling feminazis on my doorsteps, hissing hexes and baying for my blood? I see that you are a champion of wimmin poetry, and wimmin writing, and wimmin this and wimmin that. That’s good. One day all of us pesky men will go to the moon, and let you gals run everything down here, and I’m sure all of us will agree that the world will be like unto a Garden of Eden, and all war and animosity will, like, just disappear once the dames are running the joint. But until then, might I remind you that Men still hold up half the sky. Dear Lizzard, while you might be the biggest fan of all things female, let me remind you that you do not, repeat NOT, actually OWN the subject of women. Any old poster, whether they be bequeathed a Charlie or a Chapel, can just write stuff on any subject they so choose to do, and should not be subjected to some nouveau Stalin who gets out the pinking shears whenever they read something that does not measure up to their strangulated world view.
You probably never expected to read this, did you? One of those nasty testosterone-driven men coming back at you and giving you a bit of lip? Well, here it is. NEWS FLASH: I have as much right to post on female subjects as do you. So please don’t censor my stuff. I see you are women of cultivated sensibilities and keen intellect. NEW FLASH: So am I. Please leave my posts alone. Notthere (talk) 06:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hello. I deleted material that was inappropriate for a talk page, ie, a creative writing exercise in pornographic fantasy about "birching" about historical figures.
- I will report your anti-feminist ranting and harassment on my talk page and to Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts. --Lizzard (talk) 07:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Notthere back. Some admin who rejoices in the sobriquet Orbis 3 has stepped in and made an executive decision in this long-running dispute re: my comments concerning Heloise’s bottom, whiter shade of pale, or not quite so. I’m satisfied with it, so I hope you can put DEFCON on amber again. (See section 13 on talk page for Abelard article on WP) I for one have “moved on”, and to show you that I can walk on the wild side mylself I will shortly direct you to a new piece I am composing concerning a truly amazing lady. When you see and read it, you will only be able to gasp: “God, why couldn’t one of the sisterhood have written this? Why did it have to be a man, and if a man, why that mongrel Notthere?. Why!? Why!!??” Notthere (talk) 03:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Feminism Task Force
[edit]Hello! I've seen you around Wikipedia and I've noticed that you joined my category "Wikipedians interested in feminism". I just wanted to let you know that you might be interested in this. Hope to see you around more and happy editing! :) --Grrrlriot (talk) 20:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Invitation
[edit]--Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 02:06, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Western commerce, industry and technologies
[edit]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Silhak --RisingSunWiki 22:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Greg-winking.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Greg-winking.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- Not sure what to do here. I emailed J. Milburn directly and the person who took the photo did too, at the time. Guess now that I've noticed it still isn't there, I'll put it up again. Lizzard (talk) 05:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Re: Wheelchair discussion
[edit]Hi there. I replied to you and Vicki on my talk page. I also read your post here. I frown upon off-wiki campaigning for reasons of transparency, but as far as those go, this was pretty innocent (it kind of makes you look like the PC police though).--Atlan (talk) 09:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, it wasn't like I was exhorting people to pile on one article or page for some kind of petty revert war. It was an open public call for people to come and edit about a subject we care about. I don't think objecting to an offensive term that affects me in my actual everyday oppression can be "pc police", either. For example, if an article on Hillary Clinton described her with a misogynist term, wouldn't you think that should be edited out for reasons of not being at all relevant or accurate? Would you think it fine to refer to a person of color with a derogatory and out of date term? It is the same in my eyes. It is not "encyclopediac" or good journalistic practice to be offensive. For example, here is a style guide from The Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/sustainability/guardian-style-guide and a quote from it:
...what we publish should reflect the traditions of tolerance and fairness that we hold dear. You will not find the Guardian or Observer writing about "bogus asylum seekers" or "black-on-black violence". Disabled people (not "the disabled") are not "wheelchair-bound" and people with learning disabilities are not "handicapped". Nor will you find stories about ""career girls" or "battling grannies". We avoid racist, sexist and other inappropriate language not to be "politically correct" but to put our beliefs into practice in the most important work we do - reporting.
Thanks for listening and I hope you can see the politics of language as something non-trivial. Why trivialize the meaning of language and word choice by calling it "pc police"? We're building something made of words -- and the words we choose are important. --Lizzard (talk) 03:39, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, as I said, I will endeavor to change the language of wheelchair related text to something we can all agree on. I will do this on the articles I edited previously and to any I encounter while editing the encyclopedia. As for the "pc police" comment: It was purely based on the one blog comment. "A bunch of us are swarming Wikipedia [to remove all instances of wheelchair bound]" just gives the wrong impression. A better course of action would be to discuss it on Wikipedia beforehand (much like we are doing now). Anyway, that's water under the bridge and no harm was done. See you around.--Atlan (talk) 07:36, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Re:Photo of Greg Hall
[edit]Taking a look at the permission email you sent, I'm afraid that is not enough. I have replied to your email with further details. J Milburn (talk) 08:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
AIV reports
[edit]Thank you for your AIV report. Please use the proper format for reporting as explained in the edit window. In your example, for IP Vandals use: {{IPvandal|IP address}}; also, please do not post to AIV unless the editor has been properly warned. (See warning templates). -- Alexf(talk) 00:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Feminism
[edit]Wiki etiquette alert
[edit]I have opened a wiki etiquette alert re your editing on the Anders talk page here: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Repeated_failures_to_assume_good_faith_and_abusive_blanking_of_sections_of_talk_page Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 19:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Research survey invitation
[edit]Greetings Geeklizzard-
My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:
https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss
Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.
This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.
If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 03:59, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Prathia Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Princeton, Selma, Terrell County and Sasser
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
A brownie for you!
[edit]Nice job on the Pamela Palmater article. SarahStierch (talk) 22:32, 15 August 2012 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Pamela Palmater, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mi'kmaq (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:53, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative
[edit]WikiWomen Unite! | |
---|---|
Hi Geeklizzard! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! |
Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!
[edit]World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC) |
- Hey Geeklizzard! I'm so happy you've signed up for the WDL project. Welcome! I noticed you're interested in Latin American content, including Venezuela. I built out a to-do list for Latin American here. Be sure to book mark it, as it'll be added to as more content is released to the WDL website (monthly). If I can help with anything, just ask. I do look forward to following your outcomes and please share them on the outcomes page. Thanks for all you do for Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership Newsletter
[edit]Hi Geeklizzard! Thanks for participating in the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. Your contributions are important to improving Wikipedia! I wanted to share a few updates with you:
- We have an easy way to now cite WDL resources. You can learn more about it on our news page, here.
- Our to-do list is being expanded and features newly digitized and created resources from libraries and archives around the world, including content from Sweden, Qatar, the Library of Congress, and more! You can discover new content for dissemination here.
- WDL project has new userbox for you to post on your userpage and celebrate your involvement. Soffredo created it, so please be sure to thank them on their talk page. You can find the userbox and add it to your page here.
- Our first batch of WDL barnstars have been awarded! Congratulations to our first recipients: ProtoplasmaKid, ChrisGualtieri, TenthEagle, Rhyswynne, Luwii, Sosthenes12, Djembayz, Parkwells, Carl Francis, Yunshui, MrX, Pharaoh of the Wizards, and the prolific Yster76!! Thank you for your contributions and keep up the great work. Be sure to share your article expansions and successes here.
Keep up the great work, and please contact me if you need anything! Thank you for all you do for free knowledge! EdwardsBot (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]thanks for having a look at Neo Boys!
Selena Deckelmann (talk) 02:49, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your improvements to Tookoolito!
[edit]Thanks very much for your improvements to Tookoolito. I did change the section headers back just a bit, in hopes that these would clarify the extent of each of Hall's Arctic forays. You've inspired me to take a fresh look at this article and see if there are still other ways it cane be improved. Clevelander96 (talk) 17:29, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
You're invited: Art & Feminism Edit-a-thon
[edit]Art & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - You are invited! | |
---|---|
Hi Geeklizzard! The first Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 in San Francisco Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Wikipedians of all experience levels are invited! Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors. |
January 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fannie Hurst may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- the [[Works Progress Administration]] in 1940. She was a member of the feminist intellectual group [[Heterodoxy (group)|Heterodoxy] in Greenwich Village, and a delegate to the [[World Health
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alpha Suffrage Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Jackson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
WWUCB Berkeley Meetup
[edit]Hey Liz,
Hope that some of the negative drama stuff going down at the NB Space hasn't affected your other productive activities. In regards to your 22:45 13 March 2014 (UTC) post on the WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon at University of California, Berkeley for your own online participation in this event, What are your thoughts about inviting to this other accomplished women associated with both Noisebridge and the East Bay's SudoRoom? E.g., Romy Ilano @romyilano and/or Naomi Most @nthmost ??
Unfortunately, although I myself am more local to the Cal campus and Sudo Room than I am to Noisebridge, afraid that I myself couldn't contribute to this WikiWomen Edit-a-thon either beforehand or on its scheduled date of Saturday, April 5.
Sfgiantsace36 (talk) 00:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaun Ellis (wolf researcher), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nez Perce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
AdaCamp Awesomeness Award
[edit]AdaCamp Awesomeness Award | |
Thanks for your participation in the lively discussions at AdaCamp, and for your contributions in all things wiki. Rosiestep (talk) 04:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC) |
WikiProject Women writers Invitation
[edit]--Rosiestep (talk) 15:26, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
You're invited! Litquake Edit-a-thon in San Francisco
[edit]You are invited! → Litquake Edit-a-thon → See you there! | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Edit-a-thon will occur in parallel with Litquake, the San Francisco Bay Area's annual literature festival. Writers from all over the Bay Area and the world will be in town during the nine day festival, so the timing is just right for us to meetup and create/translate/expand/improve articles about literature and writers. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. This event will include new editor training. RSVP →here←. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:42, 27 September 2014 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for March 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Agnes Morley Cleaveland
- added a link pointing to Bloomers
- F. A. Nettelbeck
- added a link pointing to Greg Hall
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meliza Bañales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Cruz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Honey Lee Cottrell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Astoria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science
[edit]You are invited! Join us remotely! | |
---|---|
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Beveridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Independent living, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ed Roberts. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
April Fools? Nope! Welcome to the Women Scientists worldwide online edit-a-thon during Year of Science
[edit]
Join us! | |
---|---|
Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon -
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
About Women
[edit]Hi Geeklizzard. I'm an editor (not very active till now) of the Italian Wikipedia, where the gender gap is a real issue. I'm trying to participate to an IEG with the project "Women are everywhere". You will find the draft at this link https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Women_are_everywhere It would be great if you could have a look at it. I need any kind of suggestion or advice to improve it. Support or endorsement would be fantastic. Many thanks, --Kenzia (talk) 13:45, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to the Bay Area WikiSalon kickoff
[edit]Liz, Sorry if this is a duplicate. Please spread the word.
We have two brief presentations lined up for our kickoff event at the Wikimedia Foundation offices in downtown San Francisco:
- The Nueva Upper School recently hosted the first ever high school Wikipedia edit-a-thon. We will hear from their research librarian, students, and faculty about what interests them about Wikipedia, what they have learned so far, and what they hope to achieve.
- Photojournalist Kris Schreier Lyseggen, author of The Women of San Quentin: The Soul Murder of Transgender Women in Male Prisons, will tell us about her work and how she researched the topic.
We allow time for informal conversation and working on articles. Wi-Fi is available. Newcomers are encouraged to attend. Bring a friend! The doors open promptly at 6:00 pm. We will have beverages and light snacks, provided by Wiki Strategies, Ben Creasy, and Wayne Calhoon.
Please note: You must register here, and bring a photo ID that matches your registration name. The building policy is strict on this point.
For further details, see here.
Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}
21:24, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Contests
[edit]User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Geeklizzard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Geeklizzard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Attention: WikiProject African diaspora participants
[edit]Hello fellow project participants. Not sure how many users are still active as normal Wikipedia editors but felt the need to attempt to get a gauge on who can be called on for help with articles falling under the umbrella of the African diaspora project. According to the project's article table there are over six thousand articles related to the African diaspora; there's not a hundred at FA/GA grade and there's over twelve hundred that are unassessed. With Wikipedia being one of the major information reference points in the world today we should consider this unacceptable. Much work needs to be done on the rating of the importance of articles as well. With more communication amongst participants and a dedication to addressing the articles on the to-do list I believe we can make this WikiProject one of the most well organized and thorough on the site. If you are interested in collaborative work with some of your fellow project members, have certain expertise on any particular subjects, ideals on/about the WikiProject, etc. simply drop your name under the "Project revision" section I've created on the project's talk page and state your intentions and main points of interest in our WikiProject and we can attempt to move forward from there. Hoping to hear from everyone soon! WikiGuy86 (talk) 03:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Geeklizzard. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Beth Winegarner for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beth Winegarner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth Winegarner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jack Frost (talk) 06:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Your upload of Double Union logo may be free
[edit]File:Double Union logo.png may not require a fair use rationale. Please check if you've applied the copyright information correctly. 84.250.17.211 (talk) 11:33, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Geeklizzard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Geeklizzard
Thank you for creating SF International HipHop DanceFest.
User:Rosguill, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
I've had to remove a significant amount of the content in the page, as the year-by-year artist listings were copied verbatim from copyrighted sources. In addition to being a copyright violation, it's better to include only the most significant performers for each year in keeping with summary style.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosguill}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
signed, Rosguill talk 00:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you reside in the United States)
[edit]I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)