Jump to content

Talk:Good News for People Who Love Bad News

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

<^>v|This album is connected|v<^>

[edit]

Indie rock?

[edit]

How is it "Indie Rock" when its released on Epic? Shouldn't that be changed? --andrew leahey 17:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

did it really get to number 1 in the states? the us number 1s of 2004 list doesn't bear this out

Because this album was released under Epic, it cannot be labeled as an Indie Rock album...Epic is not an Independent label, it's owned by Sony BMG. Narcolepticpathos (talk) 01:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, the term 'indie' when used in the UK, tends to refer to a specific genre of music, rather than the status of their record label; in line with this popular trend, record producers will often coerce their artists into imitating the style of so-called 'indie'. Neptune777 (talk) 01:14, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Swear word count

[edit]

Is this really important? Listing the amount of times the album uses the word fuck or other words? Seems a little unimportant.

If it isn't important I'm going to all the album pages that discuss the FCC not giving it a parental advisory and deleting that part of the page. Thank you for your infinite wisdom.

Satin In A Coffin merge

[edit]

Should this song have an article? It seems that the ones with their own articles are the promo or single releases only. I'm in favour of redirecting that article here. Kevin 00:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's no real merit to the Satin article at all. It describes a fairly obscure and non-notable song like a kid would. Delete/redirect.

The info in the song's page should be merged into this article. Carl.bunderson 00:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't even think that the song is notable enough to be mentioned even here. I think that it should be deleted. --Xmicrotrashx 03:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like consensus. I have redirected that article here, and not copied any of the text. Kevin 04:06, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Good News for People Who Love Bad News. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Good_News_for_People_Who_Love_Bad_News&oldid=1211193451"