Talk:No Prayer for the Dying

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Removed cover section

This is already discussed at Eddie's article -TheHande 11:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IronMaidenNoPrayerForTheDying.jpg

Image:IronMaidenNoPrayerForTheDying.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Iron Maiden - No Prayer For The Dying.jpg

Image:Iron Maiden - No Prayer For The Dying.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IronMaidenNoPrayerForTheDying.jpg

Image:IronMaidenNoPrayerForTheDying.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cover

My cover of this is diffrent, Title is written by diffrent characters like gothic, do you have any solution for that? On back cover are russian letters, on disc too, disc is all red with black letters.

I must know the answer, please do not delate this.

Quote of back cover:

      Все права Защищеньі. Лицензионное соглашение No2111/M3 от 12.11.96 г. между PAO и OOO "СПЮРК".
                                                 Заявка No 352
                                                     1990

The same is on disc.

Charlotte the Harlot

"Hooks in You" is NOT a continuation of the Charlotte the Harlot saga. While the song makes a reference to "a view at number 22", the song says nothing about Charlotte nor even mentions her name. I would even go as far as saying "From Here to Eternity" isn't part of the CtH saga either, but at least that song mentions her by name.

"22 Acacia Avenue" is billed as "the continuing saga of Charlotte the Harlot". I'm pretty sure no other song is. Furthermore, it and "Charlotte the Harlot" are the only two songs that both mention Charlotte by name and involve her life as a prostitute.

I went ahead and edited the faulty assumption out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ynot4tony2 (talk • contribs) 13:36, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Importance

Can someone let me know, why this is in Low importance scale and Fear of the Dark in High importance scale? In my opinion, this is much tighter album and was bigger turn on Iron Maiden's career than Fear of the Dark (simpler songs, a new guitarist). 88.192.104.142 (talk) 15:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who took out hard rock?

This definitely has a hard rock sound as does Fear of the Dark. I put not one but two references in. I'm putting it back, those references were legit.

I did. The citations you included merely suggest a lean towards a hard rock sound, they do not state that the album is outright hard rock.--Nerdtrap (talk) 08:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well yeah, leaning towards hard rock. That means hard rock also applies to this album.108.81.33.59 (talk) 05:12, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not, an element of a particular sound does not mean that it fully applies. For example, the song "The Rage" from the Judas Priest album, British Steel, has a clear reggae reference at the beginning, but that does not justify adding reggae to the album's genre.--Nerdtrap (talk) 09:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No Prayer for the Dying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5hFf8iFDu to http://www.irishcharts.ie/search/placement

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No Prayer for the Dying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110825184125/http://derek.server311.com/riggsart/Pages/maiden.dir/11prayer02.html to http://derek.server311.com/riggsart/Pages/maiden.dir/11prayer02.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:38, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]