User talk:Thepcnerd
Welcome
[edit]Hi and welcome to wikipedia. I noticed you had a blank talk page, so I decided to welcome you. I hope you like it and decide to stay. Here are some handy links for newcomers.
- Welcome
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Help pages
- Village pump
- help desk
- Wiquette
Also you can sign your name on talk pages and vote pages with three tildes like this ~~~, and your name with a time stamp with four like this ~~~~. Howabout1 01:21, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
Image:Netsplit 2.gif
[edit]You might want to at least make sure the fonts match. Dysprosia 08:46, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
This week's computer and video games improvement drive
[edit]Havok (T/C) 11:34, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
I have tagged this image as not having a source. Could you possibly provide one? Thanks. --tomf688{talk} 19:10, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
You edited the image detail yourself and granted GFDL for this image.[1] You can't turn around and remove it unfortunately. Garglebutt / (talk) 06:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image%3AContents_of_MRE.jpg&diff=18226443&oldid=17492770){kind=link}
- Unfortunately, that was not me and thus he who performed that action did not have permission to grant any change in licensing therefor you cannot turn around and put it back. Thepcnerd 06:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- All of your image contributions were changed by your userid to GFDL in mid 2005. It is a bit of a stretch to suggest this was a mysterious impersonator rather than yourself. I note on your user page that an article you created about your own web site was removed, presumably deleted due to being non notable and you are now experiencing sour grapes. Unfortunately numerous articles are created about web sites that end up being removed because they fail the tests on WP:WEB. You've made lots of worthwhile edits and I encourage you to keep contributing to Wikipedia. Garglebutt / (talk) 06:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Sadly, but not regrettedly, I am done. Although apparently so the things you have stated, they are not. I would never release my photography under GFDL. I sell it commercially, although not all of these shots specifically, but I sell my photography and the GFDL is not the place for it. Thepcnerd 06:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- What I am not clear on is why you are only disputing copyright for one of the images you contributed. Can you suggest an explanation as to how your userid was used to edit the copyright to GFDL on your contributions alone? Garglebutt / (talk) 06:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Is there a need for me to do so? I am telling you that I did not permit this license change and you are bucking me on it. There is no case here. This is my art. I am telling you that I did not and would not ever permit GFDL licensing. Do not continue to edit my art against my will or you too will be responding to my lawyer along with Wikipedia. Despite this being my lower-end work I do fight for it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thepcnerd (talk • contribs) 006-02-28 17:55:37.
- Sorry but this is nonsense. Your edit history shows edits in and around the particular edits that moved these images to GFDL and subsequently you then tried to revoke this copyright on the same day your article was deleted as non-notable. I understand that you are bitter about this but legally you gave up your rights to these images. Immaterial of whether you now regret this, the proverbial bird has flown the coop. Garglebutt / (talk) 07:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, but you cannot tell me whether or not my almost always logged in username was used by me. I remember changes I make, and I attest that I would never place my photography in such an open license as the GFDL. Thepcnerd 07:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Regretably your threats against me and Wikipedia will now lead to you being banned. I wish this had worked out better for you and Wikipedia. Garglebutt / (talk) 07:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- You haven't seen threats yet. You have only seen me state that I am having my lawyer contact you, and if this is grounds for bannation, than this is grounds for talking to the media about your inability to comply with copyright law. Thepcnerd 07:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry for me mistaking you for somebody important. You have no say in any of this. Thepcnerd 07:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- You haven't seen threats yet. You have only seen me state that I am having my lawyer contact you, and if this is grounds for bannation, than this is grounds for talking to the media about your inability to comply with copyright law. Thepcnerd 07:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Regretably your threats against me and Wikipedia will now lead to you being banned. I wish this had worked out better for you and Wikipedia. Garglebutt / (talk) 07:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, but you cannot tell me whether or not my almost always logged in username was used by me. I remember changes I make, and I attest that I would never place my photography in such an open license as the GFDL. Thepcnerd 07:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry but this is nonsense. Your edit history shows edits in and around the particular edits that moved these images to GFDL and subsequently you then tried to revoke this copyright on the same day your article was deleted as non-notable. I understand that you are bitter about this but legally you gave up your rights to these images. Immaterial of whether you now regret this, the proverbial bird has flown the coop. Garglebutt / (talk) 07:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Is there a need for me to do so? I am telling you that I did not permit this license change and you are bucking me on it. There is no case here. This is my art. I am telling you that I did not and would not ever permit GFDL licensing. Do not continue to edit my art against my will or you too will be responding to my lawyer along with Wikipedia. Despite this being my lower-end work I do fight for it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thepcnerd (talk • contribs) 006-02-28 17:55:37.
- What I am not clear on is why you are only disputing copyright for one of the images you contributed. Can you suggest an explanation as to how your userid was used to edit the copyright to GFDL on your contributions alone? Garglebutt / (talk) 06:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Sadly, but not regrettedly, I am done. Although apparently so the things you have stated, they are not. I would never release my photography under GFDL. I sell it commercially, although not all of these shots specifically, but I sell my photography and the GFDL is not the place for it. Thepcnerd 06:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Sigh, this image has been released under GFDL, and so it will stay GFDL forever, there's no way back. You tried to push your article on wikipedia by giving it a GFDL license, and this are the consequences. --LimoWreck 10:13, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- All of your image contributions were changed by your userid to GFDL in mid 2005. It is a bit of a stretch to suggest this was a mysterious impersonator rather than yourself. I note on your user page that an article you created about your own web site was removed, presumably deleted due to being non notable and you are now experiencing sour grapes. Unfortunately numerous articles are created about web sites that end up being removed because they fail the tests on WP:WEB. You've made lots of worthwhile edits and I encourage you to keep contributing to Wikipedia. Garglebutt / (talk) 06:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Image:Contents of MRE.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Contents of MRE.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
I've listed the image for deletion, and will create a replacement. --Christopherlin 15:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Legal Threats
[edit]
Blocked - legal or personal threat against another userYou have been indefinitely blocked from editing this site for posting what could be seen as a threat against another user on Wikipedia. Wikipedia does not tolerate such posting. Users who make threats, whether legal, personal, or work-related, that in any way are seen as an attempt to intimidate another user, are immediately blocked. See Wikipedia:No legal threats for more information.
In view of your comments made to Garglebutt, namely "[...] or you too will be responding to my lawyer along with Wikipedia [...] I am having my lawyer contact you" you have been blocked from editing this site.
- You have been indefinitely blocked for legal threats. You may attempt legal action if you truly believe it is necessary. However, as Wikipedia:No legal threats makes clear, it is unacceptable to threaten to do so on Wikipedia. Also, further legal threats on this talk page will result in it being protected. Superm401 - Talk 06:36, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Speedy deletion: Statistically Improbable Phrases
[edit]Hi, I have nominated Statistically Improbable Phrases for speedy deletion. Please contest this if you believe the nomination is not appropriate. Thanks.--Louiedog (talk) 20:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)