User talk:Mvuijlst

Image copyright

I'd like to thank you profusely for the detailed source and copyright info on the portrait you uploaded. Please keep up the good work! Best, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:25, 2004 Aug 16 (UTC)

Farmer and sons

Fine choice of an image to spend time restoring. Thanks. --KP Botany (talk) 23:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 23:34, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto the Hines even if I disagreed with how you did it. --KP Botany (talk) 20:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Saint Nicholas' Church in Ghent

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Sint-Niklaaskerk, Gent2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 08:43, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Farmer and sons in dust storm, Cimarron County

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Farmer walking in dust storm Cimarron County Oklahoma2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 10:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Glassworks

Done. TomStar81 (Talk) 21:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 21:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Midnight at the glassworks

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Midnight at the glassworks2b.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 09:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Leaving the opera

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Sortie de l'opéra en l'an 2000-2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 09:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Belgium

Hi Michel, found something beautiful in the Library of Congress today: a fundraising poster for World War I humanitarian relief in Belgium. Seems fitting to offer it to you.[1] Due to quirks in copyright law and site policies it qualifies for local en:wiki upload under the PD-1923 tag, but cannot be uploaded to Commons. Interested? Durova^Charge! 04:47, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh nice. I'll have a stab at it, thanks! -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 05:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Butt, Baden-Powell, Taft, Bryce2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 00:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 05:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		For wonderful work restoring historic images, thank you and by all means continue the good work. I can't wait to see what you do next! Cheers and warmest regards, Durova^Charge! 20:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Frances Densmore recording Mountain Chief2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 20:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wahey! -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 20:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Eclairage.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 22:32, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh great! First scan of my own I ever uploaded to Wikipedia! -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 22:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the CP Stone photo

File:Charles P. Stone2b.jpg looks great. The handle link to the loc document doesn't work, though. I was curious about the file name change, and especially the new file name at the loc. BusterD (talk) 03:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Link fixed! -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 11:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. One more thing, and perhaps it's just me. Would you mind looking at the crop again? I think the background is too tall, especially when the image is deployed in the infobox. Out of curiosity, what made you choose this image to improve? Where did you see it? BusterD (talk) 13:53, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Crop adjusted. I was randomly ficking through images at the Library of Congress when this one my eye. I wonder what happened to Hettie -- imagine the stories she could tell! -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 14:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a very compelling image. I took the liberty of updating the French pedia article. BusterD (talk) 15:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Republican costume by David

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Le représentant du peuple François en fonction2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 12:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image restoration

Hi Michel! I was notified that you might be the person to talk to about high-quality image restoration. I do not want to impose or anything, but if you have time, please take a look at this picture and see if you want to restore it. It would be great to improve the article Jaffa–Jerusalem railway, which I'm slowly working to bring up to GA status, and could fit in other article, such as Jerusalem and Jerusalem Railway Station (which I intend to write in the future). Thanks, Ynhockey ^(Talk) 20:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya! I'm on holiday right now in a cottage with just the laptop and (very) rudimentary internet access. But it's the next image on my list, I'll have a crack at it asap! -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 22:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There you go: file:Jerusalem Railway Station2.jpg -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 17:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the great restoration! Do you this it has a chance as a featured picture? (I don't know that much about the process) --Ynhockey ^(Talk) 18:54, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks. It may have a shot at FP, but I can also imagine comments along the lines of "you can barely see the building itself". Which could then be answered in the vein of "yes, but a railway is more than just the building, this illustrates the rails that came from Belgium and the locomotives that came from X, etc.". I'll have a go, we'll see. :) -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 19:27, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Robert McGee, scalped as a child by Sioux Chief Little Turtle in 1864-2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 17:19, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Andrew Curtin2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 18:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Charles Pomeroy Stone and Hettie

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Charles P. Stone2b.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 11:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cornelius Vanderbilt daguerrotype

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Cornelius Vanderbilt Daguerrotype2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 11:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Siegmund Breitbart

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Siegmund Breitbart2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 10:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Thomas Edison

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Thomas Edison2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 10:21, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Jaffa-Jerusalem railway

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Jerusalem Railway Station2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 11:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, and thanks again! --Ynhockey ^(Talk) 12:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo! -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 14:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Caruso with phonograph

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Caruso with phonograph2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 02:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Rockefeller Center, December 1933

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Rockefeller Center, December 1933.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 02:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Birth of Venus

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:La nascita di Venere (Botticelli).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 10:32, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Featured picture promotion

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Apollo 11 Launch2.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 03:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit! Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 03:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem! -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 08:27, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May I suggest nominating this at WP:VPC? It's probably a little under the necessary resolution to pass at FPC, but should certainly pass there. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 04:13, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NICE interface modification: We need more users!

Hello. I am one of the developers of the NICE tool and the related study's contact person. I hope you have been finding the modification helpful so far. We have been gathering users for a little over a month now, but we haven't gotten as many users as we had hoped. We'd appreciate it if you would share the NICE tool with any editors that might find it useful. --EpochFail ^{(talk|contribs)} 16:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant work

Your photography is like nothing I've ever seen before. Such good poses, and so little editing. Have you considered writing for a photography criticism magazine? You could certainly use that work to land a job critiquing others to help them improve. Really, just beautiful, one-of-it's kind work. It's good to have you here. -->David Shankbone 15:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David, give it a rest. You're taking a comment I made on your weblog on-wiki. This is not done. -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 16:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Full version of NICE to be released

Thanks for helping me and my colleagues test the NICE interface modification. Depending on when you installed the tool, you were only presented with a specific subset of the features we have developed. We are ready to roll out the full feature set which, we expect, will make the gadget significantly more useful. Before we do that, we'd like you to answer a few questions about your activity in Wikipedia as it relates to undoing other's edits and what you thought of the NICE features you were shown.

The survey will ask for your Wikipedia username, but you can participate anonymously if you choose. To do so, send me an email with an address I can respond to and I will have the survey software respond with an anonymous token for you to continue. --EpochFail ^{(talk|contribs)} 16:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi there,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Midnight at the glassworks2b.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 7, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-09-07. This is for Labor Day in the US, so it's a little ahead of schedule. howcheng {chat} 05:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen.jpg

File:Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Roentgen2.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Roentgen2.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mvuijlst! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 709 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Walter Hus - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Esther Brimmer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christy Mathewson2.jpg

Have you considered nominating this image for FP status? It's a really great picture and restoration job! Staxringold _talk^contribs 01:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It was nominated a while back but got one oppose and so did not get featured. Ah well. :) -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 12:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michael,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Thomas Edison2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 11, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-02-11. howcheng {chat} 18:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Siegmund Breitbart2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 22, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-02-22. howcheng {chat} 18:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Caruso with phonograph2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 25, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-02-25. howcheng {chat} 22:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Abuse_of_Page_Protection_tools

I have spelled out what happened. Shoemaker's Holiday ^talk 20:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Sint-Niklaaskerk, Gent2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 23, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-03-23. howcheng {chat} 21:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Farmer walking in dust storm Cimarron County Oklahoma2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 27, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-03-27. howcheng {chat} 21:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Sortie de l'opéra en l'an 2000-2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 7, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-04-07. howcheng {chat} 17:42, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Andrew Curtin2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 23, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-04-23. howcheng {chat} 16:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2

Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 01:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Eclairage.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 3, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-05-03. howcheng {chat} 23:43, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Robert McGee, scalped as a child by Sioux Chief Little Turtle in 1864-2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 10, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-05-10. howcheng {chat} 07:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Cornelius Vanderbilt Daguerrotype2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 27, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-05-27. howcheng {chat} 20:43, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Jerusalem Railway Station2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 2, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-06-02. howcheng {chat} 07:55, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Rockefeller Center, December 1933.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 23, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-06-23. howcheng {chat} 22:26, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:La nascita di Venere (Botticelli).jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 29, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-06-29. howcheng {chat} 04:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/File:La_nascita_di_Venere_(Botticelli).jpg

This seems to have a couple issues, most notably no longer appearing in the article on the subject. I think it's a good idea to discuss it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:46, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Butt, Baden-Powell, Taft, Bryce2.jpg

Hi Michel, just to let you know that an image you restored is currently being considered for delisting, see here. Maedin\^talk 21:29, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Christy Mathewson 2

Just to let you know I have renominated this picture. J Milburn (talk) 11:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Christy Mathewson 2

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Christy Mathewson2.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 07:19, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Charles P. Stone2b.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 30, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-09-30. howcheng {chat} 18:07, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Genbox family history.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Genbox family history.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:03, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:I Love Katamari.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I Love Katamari.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 07:20, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Captured English gun.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Captured English gun.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are three versions of that image: a low resolution courtesy copy, a high resolution (lossy) jpg copy, and this file, which is the original high resolution (lossless) version. MediaWiki apparently can't create thumbnaild for png files as big as this, and that's the only reason this image is orphaned. But hey, I'm not stopping anyone. -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 14:08, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cleanup

Hello, Mvuijlst. You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An AFD you participated in has been started again

I'm contacting everyone that participated in the last one, which ended earlier this month, to inform them of the new one. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aziz Shavershian (2nd nomination) Dream Focus 13:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Wikipedia does have a policy that says that people notable for only one event are not notable forever.—Ryulong (竜龙) 20:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We'll just have to agree to disagree. I think my WP:NTEMP beats your WP:1E. -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 21:00, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, I think Wikipedia should do its best to keep the kind of content in that WP:1E tries to keep away. Wikipedia could really shine if it covered all sorts of ephemera, stuff no-one would remember if it weren't for Wikipedia. -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 21:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NTEMP states

While notability itself is not temporary, from time to time re-assessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a deletion discussion, or new evidence may arise for articles previously deemed unsuitable. Thus, articles may be proposed for deletion or recreated months or even years after being earlier considered.
In particular, if reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual.

This seems to be a valid definition of what I am currently doing in regards to Shavershian. And your current beliefs are not held by the majority of the project. On this website, we have had to make WP:1E and WP:BLP1E to prevent articles on people who briefly appear in the media, but then fade away into obscurity. If no one is going to remember it unless we retain information on it, then it perhaps it never really made any actual impact on society or history such that we should cover it.—Ryulong (竜龙) 21:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hear what you're saying, and there was no real need to copy-paste WP:NTEMP here. I still think the article should be kept (WP:1E doesn't apply here anyway), and furthermore even if it did, I think WP:1E itself should be removed. Last time I checked, I was entitled to my own opinion. I don't really understand why you're getting into this discussion. -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

House spider picture

Discussing your picture at http://spinnen-forum.de/smf/index.php?topic=12297.0 we found out that your picture

doesn't show a Tegenaria but a male Amaurobius similis (please see there). So we moved it to the correct name. Kind regards --Buachamer (talk) 05:21, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 22:10, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Christy Mathewson2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 12, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-08-12. —howcheng {chat} 06:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since you deprodded it

FYI: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jos Clijsters . --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 21:54, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Midnight Sun (graphic novel)

The article Midnight Sun (graphic novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the GNG and WP:BOOK; reviews are almost exclusively from bloggers and public posts. No substantive improvement in over a year, tagged as an orphan for months. ZERO G-News hits.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 05:21, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Wolven 1-3 covers.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Wolven 1-3 covers.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:26, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Step 1: PROD article, don't leave message on talk page of article creator. Step 2: Delete said article. Step 3: remove any orphaned media left over. Hooray for deletionism! -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 08:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Huis van Alijn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Web Search Engine

Hi Mvuijlst, how do you do? Hope everything is well. I saw you edited the article 'Web search engine', and I tried editing it too. However, because of this new visual tag editor, it is not working and the format of the table is now weird. If it's ok, could you tell me how you edited it with this new editor? Or can you still use the regular editor? Thanks! Cheers, Zalunardo8 (talk) 13:59, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the article using the old editor, i.e. using "edit source" and not "edit". The new editor may break tables. Possibly. -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 14:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's what I realized.. :( I'll reverted it and edit it using the 'edit source' link. Thank you very much! Zalunardo8 (talk) 14:06, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just did just that. :) -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 14:07, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Butt, Baden-Powell, Taft, Bryce2.jpg 2

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Butt, Baden-Powell, Taft, Bryce2.jpg 2 may be of interest. J Milburn (talk) 09:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Puddles Pity Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Le représentant du peuple François en fonction2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 4, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-04-04. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Michel,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Ambrose Burnside2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 23, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-05-23. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mvuijlst. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mvuijlst. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mvuijlst. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Walter Hus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Walter Hus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Hus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RJFJR (talk) 19:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Mvuijlst. You stated that there are numerous articles that verify WP:NM for Walter Hus. Please add a few of them to the article—for verification. Regards Tapered (talk) 04:10, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. - Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 07:45, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Please see AfD. Tapered (talk) 03:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the record: you "disagree" mainly because you had no idea what the sources were (please see AfD). - Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mvuijlst. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pillow (bodybuilder) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pillow (bodybuilder) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pillow (bodybuilder) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Capt. Milokan (talk) 01:17, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:College of Europe logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:College of Europe logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Transit (2012 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transit (2012 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transit (2012 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 18:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Earl Fred Bennett moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Earl Fred Bennett, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Barman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trainspotting. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Earl Fred Bennett

Hello, Mvuijlst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Earl Fred Bennett, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]