Talk:Carlingford railway line

Australia: Sydney / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Carlingford railway line is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 6, 2016

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rose Hill platform

Is the platform at Rose Hill really sixteen cars long? It seems unlikely because CityRail doesn't usually operate Electric Multiple Unit rolling stock longer than 8 cars... Techelf 10:09, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Great job

Great work on this article! --Alexxx1 07:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

mileniums and oscars

i have seen pictures of oscars and milleniums operating on the line.... do they still operate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hartie52 (talk • contribs) 04:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Northern railway line, Sydney which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 13:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 08:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Carlingford railway line → Carlingford Line – More accurate name as of 21/10/13. Evidence on [1] Marcnut1996 (talk) 08:47, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merger proposal

This pairing of infrastructure and service are very much intertwined. Both articles are very short and are always going to have considerable overlap. The split was performed without discussion so there is no consensus for the current structure. Gareth (talk) 19:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Since the line and its services operate (for the most part) independently of the rest of the network, separate articles would only confuse lay readers. Mqst north (talk) 04:55, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Agree with all points from Gareth. cpandilo 04:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Having separate articles on the physical rail line and the Sydney Trains service seems excessive. The distinction between the two can be easily covered in one article. Wcp07 (talk) 06:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carlingford railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151210184912/http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/parramatta-light-rail/how-preferred-network-was-chosen to http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/parramatta-light-rail/how-preferred-network-was-chosen

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]