Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/BrokenSegue
"I want everyone to see this" does not strike me as a particularly good reason for preserving someone's childish and disruptive edits. They should be cleaned up so that people can use RfA normally, not frozen so that we can shove Netoholic's misbehavior into as many faces as possible. --Michael Snow 05:56, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- You are right. It's preserved in the page history anyway. Neutralitytalk 05:58, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
Take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fvw2 and other recent votes. Supporters of candidates will typically take great strides to respond to the Oppose votes (or "disrupt the RfA" as you call it). In this vote I would like the supporters to explain why they support the candidate, exactly the way Neutrality asked me to explain my oppose vote. -- Netoholic @ 06:06, 2005 Jan 9 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BrokenSegue page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BrokenSegue" page.
