Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARCHILAB
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:05, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus. Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:05, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Comments from Wikipedia:Pages needing translation:
By User:Pierregrenier in French. -- Infrogmation 18:01, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I think this page should be sent for deletion. It's not an article. It looks like a newspaper article and copyvio. It's about an architects' conference that happened in 2001 and was written BEFORE the conference. Looks like a sort of announcement that it will happen, with some general statements about architecture. What do people think? Mona-Lynn 21:06, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- If the noticeability of ARCHILAB per se can not be established (which would imply to do a mayor rewrite) I would concur with you Lectonar 06:22, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Listing for deletion is fine by me. I wanted to run it by someone with a better grasp of French before deciding to do that. -- Infrogmation 06:41, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- The text is kind of dull, really. Charles Matthews 11:42, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I agree, this doesn't read at all like an encyclopedia article or anything that could be mangled into one. I have listed it on VfD. — Ливай | ☺ 04:05, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Listing for deletion is fine by me. I wanted to run it by someone with a better grasp of French before deciding to do that. -- Infrogmation 06:41, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- If the noticeability of ARCHILAB per se can not be established (which would imply to do a mayor rewrite) I would concur with you Lectonar 06:22, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: I presume this is ARCHILAB's site: [1], seems like a real enough architectural conference - 2004 was it's sixth year. Probably article-worthy. This article is a French press release though, needs much attention. --bainer 05:20, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Not sure if they vote is needed... but it'd be a shame to have it deleted before even translated... (unless copyvio). gren 03:48, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.