Talk:List of family trees
Appearance
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Is there a way to create a tree without making it an image? --rs2 17:58, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- You could write it in wikicode, but it'd be very ugly and tedious. You could draw it in Microsoft Word and save it as a Word Document, but it's look rather ugly. I know this is a very, very belated answer to your question... ugen64 02:43, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
There's a category "family trees" as well as a "list of family trees." Are both needed? Also, the apple family tree could probably be merged into the "apple" article, in my opinion. --Doctorcherokee 01:27, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Of course both are necessary. Categories and lists are the soma of this brave new world. muriel@pt 17:39, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
What is wrong with the family trees? A lot of them are gone and the image title still there. Did someone change them?
Start a discussion about improving the List of family trees page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "List of family trees" page.