This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
Note that this is an encyclopedia, not the place to argue about to whom it belongs. The article mentions that it was in Laos for quite some time of its history, but also in Lannathai as well as finally in Bangkok. Thus both Laos and Thailand have reasons to claim ownership, but there is no point to do that here. We just report the facts. andy 18:30, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Right to claim ownership? Then which country suppose to own the painting 'Monalisa'? Italy or France?? Can Italy then claim ownership over Da Vinci's painting which is displayed in Louvre Museum in Paris??
Even going further with this does it even really belong to Thailand or Laos. it seems Burma was where it was intende to go. Even Cambodia seems to have a higher claim on it than Thaland or Laos. You could put it at possession is proof of ownership at this point. Someday this little Buddha may one day find another home as history is now and tomorrow. There's no destination for buddhas only a journey as they say and one day all things turn to earth.61.19.68.30 (talk) 07:23, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have encountered literature that have claimed the famous "Emerald Buddha" in Bangkok is carved out of green jasper, or even green agate. Everyone agrees it is not, in fact, an emerald. Having seen the beautiful object myself I am inclined to believe it is very fine Burmese Jadeite Jade because of the translucent to semi-transparent lustre and the saturated emerald green color. Can this be settled once and for all? Buddmar01:47, 20 May 2007 (UTC)buddmar[reply]
If you ask the gem trading community in Bangkok the consensus is that it's jadeite. Mind you, not many people are willing to go on record to speculate that it's anything but the most divine emerald/jade --58.9.185.20821:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well this article contradicts itself claiming that it is Green Jasper in the first paragraph and Jadeite in the final paragraph. Perhaps both references should be moved to a new section which states it is not Emerald and discusses the controversy of the material it is made of. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.34.251.109 (talk) 13:15, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
IP vandalism, reverted. On another note, however, Willuconquer's recent reorganisation contained "according the Cambodian Royal Chronicles" in the section heading, while there's no such mention of royal chronicles in the source. I also have to question whether lumping legend and history together was a good idea. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]