Talk:Kiska

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alaska C‑class Mid‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: History / Physical geography C‑class Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Red

This article is apparently showing up red (nonexistant) in other articles. Hopefulyl this comment will fix it. →Raul654 23:20, Feb 9, 2004 (UTC)

Escaped

"One member of the detachment escaped for 50 days. Starving, thin, and extremely cold, he eventually surrendered to the Japanese."

Any idea where this comes from? Is this true or apocryphal? What was this person's name, and are there any records of this? I've tried searching for information about anything related to this, and so far I'm turning up nothing, can anyone help? Altima 19:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese evacuation

I heard something about this sort of thing happening in WWII, that the Americans got together a massive army with Canadian troops and invaded some island named Kiska only to find the Japanese not on it. I was skeptical, but boy is this hilarious! Did this really happen? I'd be laughing all night! WinterSpw 05:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Japanese left about a week before the Allies landed (See G.R. Perras. 2003. Stepping Stones to Nowhere: The Aleutian Islands, Alaska, and American Military Strategy, 1867-1945. UBC Press, 304pp. (ISBN: 1591148367)). Albnd (talk) 15:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a Japanese film from 1965 about the evacuation, with Toshiro Mifune as leading actor: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058634/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_94 195.128.10.106 (talk) 07:54, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Current population?

The article doesn't seem to mention current population. Is the island populated, and if, by how many and what are they doing on the island? -- 83.102.68.20 (talk) 14:24, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The island is uninhabited Albnd (talk) 08:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency

The destroyer USS Abner Read hit a mine, resulting in 87 casualties.

The article USS Abner Read (DD-526) reads that "The destroyer lost 70 men who were killed or missing". Although the previous line, "Men sleeping in aft compartments suffered from smoke inhalation. In the darkness, a few men fell through holes in the deck into fuel oil tanks below" could account for the extra 17. But that article doesn't seem to have a reference either. -- œ ^™ 20:58, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kiska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081007081155/http://www.csp.navy.mil:80/news/rel08054.html to http://www.csp.navy.mil/news/rel08054.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kiska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080723184137/http://community.codemasters.com/forum/showthread.php?t=296353 to http://community.codemasters.com/forum/showthread.php?t=296353

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kiska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Russian name

Russian name is historically relevant because it was discovered by Russian explorer and this name is searchable in old documents. - Altenmann >talk 01:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fate of native population?

The article makes note that "Kiska Island had been densely populated by native peoples for thousands of years" before Vitus Bering found it, but makes no further reference to these people or who they were. In context it was obviously the Aleut, and one can assume they were relocated, enslaved, slaughtered, or perished from introduced diseases; yet their history and ultimate outcome is oddly absent.

The article is nigh entirely focused on the island's role in the Second World War and, to a lesser extent, the historical Russian fur trade. There's little interest shown in anything beforehand in its supposed millennia of history. 51.37.63.196 (talk) 15:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you write up this history yourself? Anybody can edit Wikipedia. Please keep in mind that you must supply your edits with references to reliable sources. Please see our policies, WP:V, WP:CITE, WP:RS. - Altenmann >talk 16:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing odd in absence of the history of some minor obscure faraway island populated by people without writing. From what I briefly saw in Russian sources, Aleuts attacked Russian traders (as far as I know, Russian traders (Promyshlenniki) accompanied by Cossacks were quite aggressive in subjugating locals, so no wonder they were met with hostilities). Clearly, Aleuts armed with bows could not resist firearms and they left the island. And this happened in many other places. I vaguely remember there were rebellions of locals on Kamchatka, Alaska and other places followed by reprisals, such as Awa'uq Massacre or Battle of Sitka. - Altenmann >talk 16:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]