Talk:Natural Capitalism

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gusconn.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

How might this entry address critiques about the commodification of nature or how people actually go about setting a price on ecosystem services? Drmedwards (talk) 20:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This entry isn't even a stub yet (barely a definition); still needs to say what Natural Capitalism is, not just what it does --maveric149

there are four trends listed in the HLL book, up front somewhere.

Sounds interesting though. I tried to check out the reference site at the bottom .... natcap.org .... but it was not available when I tried. I will try it again later.

This looks like an emerging field, topic or definition. I suspect some will not like this .... I think it may be appropriate as long as it is dated as this is ...

it isn't, really, the UN now uses the term "natural capital" - and once bureaucrats get ahold of something... the "ism" refers to the use of the standard neoclassical economics models, as Hawken, Lovins, and Lovins do, i.e. they believe capitalism works when you set up the political economy right.

how else to keep wikipedia current? Presumabably the new few thousand readers will have bold editors to delete or annotate information that goes out of fashion???? :)

Got over 200K google hits on "Natural Capitalism"! Apparently very real chance this will remain in the lexicon.

user:mirwin

I attempted to add a basic description of the essential elements of the theory. -- M0llusk (talk) 03:37, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The modified title seems wrong. That is the full title of the book, but the book is about a concept which is the same as the primary title. The correct title for this page and the discussion page is the more simple "Natural Capitalism" that it started with. The full title of the book as published can be noted in the text and references. -- M0llusk (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Natural Capitalism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150525012029/http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/010556.html to http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/010556.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]