Talk:First Things First 1964 manifesto

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Literature / Continental / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Continental philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

From Votes for deletion:

consists only of the text of the manifesto. -- Khym Chanur 02:36, Nov 16, 2003 (UTC)

- Delete, source text. -- Mattworld 03:26, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- Part of the same entries as above. Just straight POV. - Marshman 04:21, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- You are a bit quick to be so judgemental. Can you not give me time to add the explanatory text. This manifesto has been very influencial in graphic design and the repecussions are still being felt. It takes a while to get this down... You might think it just a point of view but unless you are in G.D I doubt you would have heard of it - I thought that that was the point of an encycleapedia to be explanatory!!?! - FT 18:31, 16 Nov 2003 (GMT)
- It looks like this one should be kept, although obviously the source text should not be there. I guess it's just being seen by others as guilty-by-associatoin. Morwen 18:37, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- Keep. Give FT time to shace it up. orthogonal 19:13, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on First Things First 1964 manifesto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070707024112/http://www.kengarland.co.uk/KG%20published%20writing/ to http://www.kengarland.co.uk/KG%20published%20writing/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]