Talk:Stepping
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
[edit]from VfD:
A bit of techie trivia that probably belongs (if this level of detail is appropriate) in some article about Intel processors. It's basically Intel's own name for a hardware/microcode release number. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 02:15, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. --Randy 02:30, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I tried to edit this page to add a serious, alternative definition of stepping. Mind you, we may need a disambiguation page. —ExplorerCDT 02:35, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Probably a disambig--stepping is also a form of dance (or at least we had a stepping team at my high school). [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 05:26, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep it. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 08:45, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep ExplorerCDT version. Remove, or better, move other stuff into Intel article. Indeed probably a disambiguation page will rise. --Gtabary 12:59, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- That version was only tongue-in-cheek, and I got flak for it...some schmuck tried to have me banned. Even the line that was taken out: "Monopedal organisms often experience difficulty in stepping." But thank you anyway. —ExplorerCDT 15:31, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I removed that line, and I found it very funny. Actually, I appreciated the whole article, which is why I reposted that version on BJAODN before cleaning it up. --L33tminion | (talk) 21:13, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
- Where'd you put that on BJAODN? That was one of the reasons I edited the article as I did. Though adding the how-to-walk approach was more than half-serious, all the time I was working on it I was thinking..."this will be on BJAODN eventually." —ExplorerCDT 05:11, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I removed that line, and I found it very funny. Actually, I appreciated the whole article, which is why I reposted that version on BJAODN before cleaning it up. --L33tminion | (talk) 21:13, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
- That version was only tongue-in-cheek, and I got flak for it...some schmuck tried to have me banned. Even the line that was taken out: "Monopedal organisms often experience difficulty in stepping." But thank you anyway. —ExplorerCDT 15:31, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- "Tongue-in-cheek" entries are considered vandalism. Referring to someone as a "schmuck" violates our "No personal attacks" policy. A sense of humour is admirable, as is boldness; please channel it a bit more appropriately. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 16:43, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Now you're just becoming harassive, jpgordon. That gripes me even more —ExplorerCDT 18:34, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- "Tongue-in-cheek" entries are considered vandalism. Referring to someone as a "schmuck" violates our "No personal attacks" policy. A sense of humour is admirable, as is boldness; please channel it a bit more appropriately. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 16:43, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and disambiguate. This rule of avoiding personal attacks should also include petty attacks and nitpicking. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 20:02, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion