This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

European Union Mid‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Czech Republic Mid‑importance

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

NPOV dispute

"... Stanislav Gross whose government will however not differ much from the previous one and was officially appointed on August 4. After a short hesitation Špidla accepted nomination to the European Commission.

Špidla is considered a part of CSSD's left wing (though he's strongly anti-communist); in foreign policy, he has always been strongly pro-European and supports further integration. His generally accepted image is a man of personal integrity and honesty (putting him at the top of Czech politicians) but a dry technocrat who couldn't communicate his undeniable statesman's vision to the public and wasn't even able to keep his own party in line as his predecessor did. His acceptance of the commission post was criticised as a "golden parachute", ousting the previous comparatively popular commissary appointed by his own government, but also as running away from his battle to steer the course of CSSD and Czech politics."

PROPHECIES IN WIKIPEDIA (viz Gross and his government) ? PHRASES FROM (antiCSSD) MEDIA, such as "golden parachute" ? And "...was criticised... " BY WHOM, WHAT ? Have you thoroughly read everything regarding to NPOV of wikipedia contributors ? Will YOU try to make more NPOV revision OR not ? Radoneme OCT 4, 2004

Re Gross and his government: will not differ much, as in does not in composition and program.
Golden parachute as a convenient, generally used shortcut term.
Was criticised, yes, by anti-CSSD media or political oopponents as well as pundits with some claim of impartiality; dissenting voices, even with an obvious agenda of their own, can't be ignored.
Yes, I have read the NPOV instructions thorougly (though of course hardly every single sentence ever written on that topic).
I don't see how to re-phrase this material so that you would consider it "more NPOV"; make some concrete suggestion and we'll see whether we can agree on that. --Malyctenar 05:19, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I just arrived on this page and the above paragraph also struck me as insufficiently neutral. The parts I think are subjective value judgements are:

"His generally accepted image is a man of personal integrity and honesty"

"putting him at the top of Czech politicians" -- suggesting a particular subjective characterisation of other Czech politicians)

"a dry technocrat" -- would everyone agree with this?

"his undeniable statesman's vision" -- would everyone agree with this?

"wasn't even able to keep his own party in line" -- this needs some references to back it up

"criticised as a golden parachute" -- this part is totally fine as long as it has a reference to such criticism, plus an attempt to present the other side of the argument too.

Randywombat (talk) 10:43, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]